Now according to Paul all are sinners and all are under sin, the bible and Yeshua shows this is incorrect.
Quote:
Ok to start with this quote is misquoted and fulfils that of a fake prophet, using others words. Paul was brought up presumably not with the Hebrew language, else he should have known that righteous means:
Right = right thinking and action, wise = to consider things carefully and as god does from all angles, ness=us to always consider others in decisions.
This I read in a Hebrew definitions book, I don't recall which, yet this is a true sense of what it means. So you can check your self, this is another definition from the Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew definitions:
Quote:
No where in Hebrew definitions does it mean, all are sinners, just they are not as stated above. Not as it means in modern English definition as taken from the Encarta dictionary:
Quote:
Also if we look where Paul supposedly quoted this from, we will see that it is actually saying the opposite.
Quote:
So if this is where he took it from, as stated by my NKJV bible, this in actual fact is saying Paul is a fool, for saying such a thing. He is using it to say that we all need Yeshua to covers us from sin, yet Yeshua said:
Quote:
This is repeated in Mathew and Mark as well, so if Christ is saying there is righteous people, what right does Paul have to say there is none righteous?
So where did Paul get the idea from that all are sinners
Quote:
Now I am aware that Paul's words are confusing and he talks like a snake winding in the sand or as Daniel put it pompous. Yet what he is trying to say is that "sin has been passed down from Adam and therefore we are all sinners for Adams mistake. So God sent Yeshua to die for us as a sacrifice and that Yeshua ended the law, so making us free of sin, as there is no law to judge us by."
Why this is so incorrect, is that Yeshua didn't end the law, in fact he added to it and that sin is not passed down, as told by Ezekiel.
Quote:
A shortened version of this is, "that sin is not passed from father to son. If one sins the other maybe of the same blood, yet sin is determined by the actions of the person not that it is hereditary", as Paul makes us believe. So there fore sin wasn't passed down from Adam and in fact we can not fulfill what Christ asked us to do whilst believing this.
Quote:
If you tell someone they are sinner, they find it harder to aim to be perfect. In fact they can't be, as there will always be that doubt, they are a sinner. This whole point defeats the objective of what Yeshua said and why this is part of the Anti-Christ.
Quote:
Rom 3:9-10 What then? Do we excel? No, in no way; for we have before charged both Jews and Greeks all with being under sin, (10) as it is written: "There is none righteous, no not one;
Ok to start with this quote is misquoted and fulfils that of a fake prophet, using others words. Paul was brought up presumably not with the Hebrew language, else he should have known that righteous means:
Right = right thinking and action, wise = to consider things carefully and as god does from all angles, ness=us to always consider others in decisions.
This I read in a Hebrew definitions book, I don't recall which, yet this is a true sense of what it means. So you can check your self, this is another definition from the Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew definitions:
Quote:
1) Just, lawful, righteous
1a) just, righteous (in government)
1b) just, right (in one's cause)
1c) just, righteous (in conduct and character)
1d) righteous (as justified and vindicated by God)
1e) right, correct, lawful
No where in Hebrew definitions does it mean, all are sinners, just they are not as stated above. Not as it means in modern English definition as taken from the Encarta dictionary:
Quote:
1. Strictly observant of morality: always behaving according to a religious or moral code
2. Justifiable: considered to be correct or justifiable
Also if we look where Paul supposedly quoted this from, we will see that it is actually saying the opposite.
Quote:
Psalm 14:1 The fool has said in his heart, There is no God! They acted corruptly; they have done abominable works, there is none who does good.
So if this is where he took it from, as stated by my NKJV bible, this in actual fact is saying Paul is a fool, for saying such a thing. He is using it to say that we all need Yeshua to covers us from sin, yet Yeshua said:
Quote:
Luke 5:32 I did not come to call the righteous to repentance, but sinners.
This is repeated in Mathew and Mark as well, so if Christ is saying there is righteous people, what right does Paul have to say there is none righteous?
So where did Paul get the idea from that all are sinners
Quote:
Rom 5:12-21 Therefore, even as through one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed on all men inasmuch as all sinned: (13) for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. (14) But death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is the type of Him who was to come; (15) but the free gift shall not be also like the offense. For if by the offense of the one many died, much more the grace of God, and the gift in grace; which is of the one Man, Yeshua Christ, abounded to many. (16) And the free gift shall not be as by one having sinned; (for indeed the judgment was of one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offenses to justification. (17) For if by one man's offense death reigned by one, much more they who receive abundance of grace and the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by One, Yeshua Christ.) (18) Therefore as by one offense sentence came on all men to condemnation, even so by the righteousness of One the free gift came to all men to justification of life. (19) For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of One shall many be made righteous. (20) But the Law entered so that the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound, (21) so that as sin has reigned to death, even so grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life by Yeshua Christ our Lord.
Now I am aware that Paul's words are confusing and he talks like a snake winding in the sand or as Daniel put it pompous. Yet what he is trying to say is that "sin has been passed down from Adam and therefore we are all sinners for Adams mistake. So God sent Yeshua to die for us as a sacrifice and that Yeshua ended the law, so making us free of sin, as there is no law to judge us by."
Why this is so incorrect, is that Yeshua didn't end the law, in fact he added to it and that sin is not passed down, as told by Ezekiel.
Quote:
Eze 18:4-22 Behold, all souls are Mine. As the soul of the father, also the soul of the son, they are Mine. The soul that sins, it shall die. (5) But a man that is just and does what is just and right, (6) and has not eaten on the mountains, nor has lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, nor has defiled his neighbor's wife, nor has come near a menstruating woman, (7) and has not ill-treated any man, but has given the debtor's pledge back to him, has robbed none by violence, has given his bread to the hungry and has covered the naked with a garment; (8) he has not given out on usury, nor has taken any increase, he has withdrawn his hand from iniquity, has done judgment between man and man, (9) has walked in My statutes, and has kept My judgments to deal truly, he is righteous, he shall surely live, says the Lord Jehovah. (10) And if he fathers a son who is violent, who sheds blood, and who does to a brother any of these; (11) even if he does do not any of these himself, but his son has, but has even eaten on the mountains, and has defiled his neighbor's wife; (12) has ill-treated the poor and needy; thieving, he stole; has not given back the pledge; and has lifted up his eyes to the idols; has committed abomination; (13) has loaned on usury; and has taken increase; shall he then live? He shall not live! He has done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be on him. (14) And, lo, if he fathers a son who sees all his father's sins which he has done, and fears, and does not do like him; (15) who has not eaten on the mountains; nor has lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel; has not defiled his neighbor's wife; (16) nor has ill-treated any man; has not withheld the pledge; nor has robbed by violence; but has given his bread to the hungry; and has covered the naked with clothes; (17) has withdrawn his hand from the poor; has not received usury nor increase; has done My judgments; has walked in My statutes; he shall not die for the iniquity of his father; he shall surely live. (18) His father, because he extorted, robbed his brother by robbery, and did what is not good among his people; lo, even he shall die in his iniquity. (19) Yet you say, Why? Does not the son bear the iniquity of the father? When the son has done justice and right, has kept all My statutes, and has done them, he shall surely live. (20) The soul that sins, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, nor shall the father bear the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be on him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be on him. (21) But if the wicked will turn from all his sins which he has committed, and keep all My statutes, and do justice and right, he shall surely live; he shall not die. (22) All his transgressions that he has done, they shall not be mentioned to him; in his righteousness that he has done he shall live.
A shortened version of this is, "that sin is not passed from father to son. If one sins the other maybe of the same blood, yet sin is determined by the actions of the person not that it is hereditary", as Paul makes us believe. So there fore sin wasn't passed down from Adam and in fact we can not fulfill what Christ asked us to do whilst believing this.
Quote:
Mat 5:48 therefore be perfect, even as your Father in Heaven is perfect.
If you tell someone they are sinner, they find it harder to aim to be perfect. In fact they can't be, as there will always be that doubt, they are a sinner. This whole point defeats the objective of what Yeshua said and why this is part of the Anti-Christ.