Thank you for replying.
Unfortunately your explanation is not consistent with reason.
The following follows:
1) "Dimensions being levels in which we live": It is evident that we live in some dimensions like lenght, width, depth, time-space, gravity as you mentioned. However, you mentioned that anti-matter is the opposite of matter.
It is not reasonable to be able to live in 2 opposites. You are either in A or B but no both. Moreover, anti-matter is not the opposite of matter, IT IS MATTER, composed with particles with sign reversal (electromagnetic charge).
This is science, the rest is science fiction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter2) "Spirit makes up all things": I don't know what you mean by "spirit" but then you mentioned about " God has given me an almost photographic spirit, in which I remember both past life's and what I viewed whilst dead."
What are "all things"?
A rock, a computer, an animal a plant, etc.. ? Do they have spirits? I wonder if God is playing "favorites" and giving some a "photographic spirit" and no to others...
3) "matter is visible anti matter is non visible.": You are half-way right. anti-matter is in matter. Science cannot deal with anything but matter which can be visible or invisible as quantum scientists can tell you.
4) "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so for matter to hold it's self up, there is anti matter."
The Law of action and reaction exists in matter. If something opposite did exist, the law also has to be the opposite, in other words, for every action there is NOT an equal and opposite reaction. This law desn't proof the existence of an opposite of matter, as a matter of fact, there are no "opposites" but rather a complementary.
5) "As for God being the 13th dimension, a dimension must contain the dimensions below it all things in the universe are contained by something, so God is all of the dimensions."
This premise is not reasonable. If God is all of the dimensions, as explained above He couldn't be "opposite" as in matter and anti-matter according to your own definition. God also should have a lenght, a width a depth, etc.. and as we all know, there is not something like that. If you are trying to say that God is "omnipresent", then this is a huge mistake.
All western religions talk about God as "the Father". You cannot have a relationship with everything and call it the "Father"...otherwise, if God is everywhere, He should also be in cats and dogs, etc... Irrational.
6) "the part that gets me and why I say it as if it is a fact, is that the commandments and the I-Ching's numerology align perfectly with this same pattern."
Those are all books written by humans and thus prone to mistakes. I could write a book too and my followers select it as "divine" and defend it to death, even though irrational it may be. We have our intellects, our reason to recognize who God is and to recognize true knowledge.
Your expereince is yours and that becomes your reality, but it cannot be called "the reality" when reasoning is not aligned with it.
This Post was from: https://www.wizanda.com/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=94&post_id=329